Search for: "In the Matter of Scott"
Results 4401 - 4420
of 7,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 12:49 pm
(For a refresher on the contest rule, you can take a look at the Pillsbury Advisory drafted by Scott Flick covering a number of on-air rules, including the contest rule, here). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Scott Page, Kiernan Terranova and Penny Valvo, [Respondents] were among the teachers retained while Gwendolyn Gingrich, Cindy Inglut and Kyle Mack [Petitioners] were among those excessed following the abolishment of the 8 positions. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 7:39 pm
She explained that the funding for the various legal actions was borne by the Georgian Government as it was a matter of national pride. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:44 am
Scott Storm oversaw the litigation of this matter. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:54 pm
Wade with that of the Dred Scott decision. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
But a bill sponsored by Scott Garrett (R-NJ) (H.R. 3798) would go even further by giving respondents a new path to federal court.The case is No. 15-997. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 7:28 am
” Press Contact: Scott Flipse @ Scott.Flipse@mail.house.gov [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 2:00 pm
None of these bills passed both houses and made it to Governor Scott’s desk for signature or veto. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
In other work with Scott Lemieux, Azari has suggested that we are in for a “long disjunction”—a period of intense competition between the two parties in which neither one dominates. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:59 am
”Further actionImmediately following the verdict, the defendants stated they were “reviewing the decision, considering our options and you will hear more from us soon about this matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
And Scott R. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
It would take just one of the other two grounds (unripe claims, lack of standing) for the court to hold that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction (lack of standing could not be cured, but if the claims were just deemed unripe at this point, the plaintiffs could refile at a later stage). [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 11:06 am
We read Dred Scott’s holding that African-Americans can’t be American citizens, Cruikshank’s holding that Congress can’t protect them from mass murder, Plessy’s defense of racial segregation. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Every detail matters to Roth. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:53 pm
In particular, I've learned that most of the idealized public impressions - and even the impressions of attorneys, for that matter, since scarce few of them will ever file a habeas writ - don't really comport with how the process functions on the ground.There are several axes around which these misconceptions occur. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 2:27 pm
He has actually studied the subject closely; here is an excerpt from a Wall Street Journal op-ed of his from 2011: In the aftermath of the Civil War, members of the 39th Congress proposed amending the Constitution to reverse the Supreme Court's notorious 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
Scott is a member of: Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Texas Public Risk Management Association International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans State and Local Government Benefit Association Scott has an undergraduate degree from Baylor University and a Master’s in Health Care Administration from Trinity University. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Condition 2 is that the opinion is on a matter of public interest and condition 3 is that an honest person could have held the opinion on the basis of (a) a fact which existed at the time the statement complained of was published; (b) a privileged statement which was published before the statement complained of. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:34 am
Rather, Scott was the blogosphere’s truth serum. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
None of this matters unless he has a trial judge seriously interested in seeing that he gets a fair trial. [read post]
