Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York" Results 4461 - 4480 of 10,091
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2016, 11:45 am by Peter Howard Tilem
As New York Criminal Defense Lawyers we have sounded the alarm on numerous occasions about the draconian enforcement of New York Knife laws by New York City Police Officers and the 5 New York City District Attorney’s Offices. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 1:02 pm by kgates
City of New York, Nos. 1-CV-3924 (JG) (VMS), 1-CV-8506 (JG) (VMS), 3-CV-0192 (JG) (VMS); 2016 WL 792396 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:18 am by Connie Eyer
With no federal claims remaining, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the creative director’s sexual orientation discrimination claims under the New York State Human Rights Law and New York City Human Rights Law, and over his other state law causes of action. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public educational institution is not an “education corporation” within the meaning of New York State’s Human Rights LawGarcia v City Univ. of N.Y., 2016 NY Slip Op 01271, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court dismissed Minerva Garcia's disability discrimination claims brought against the City University of New York pursuant to New York’s Executive Law §296(4),… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Scheinkman, determining the fair value of a minority interest in two limited liability companies that, as franchisees, own and operate almost three dozen Planet Fitness health clubs in the New York City metro area and also own exclusive rights to develop additional clubs in New York and parts of Southern California. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Scheinkman, determining the fair value of a minority interest in two limited liability companies that, as franchisees, own and operate almost three dozen Planet Fitness health clubs in the New York City metro area and also own exclusive rights to develop additional clubs in New York and parts of Southern California. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Scheinkman, determining the fair value of a minority interest in two limited liability companies that, as franchisees, own and operate almost three dozen Planet Fitness health clubs in the New York City metro area and also own exclusive rights to develop additional clubs in New York and parts of Southern California. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  Indeed, although Article V of the New York Convention 1958 creates a presumption that the foreign Court will respect a decision of the Court of the seat of an Award, the word “may” implies that there is no compulsion to do so. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Seniority for the purposes of layoff and reinstatement from a preferred list set out in "settlement agreement"Giardina v New York City Health and Hosp. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Second Circuit precedent controls The Christiansen case was decided in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (i.e., New York City). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:02 pm by Lawrence Solan
”  Lockhart had earlier been convicted in New York for having sexually abused his then 53-year old girlfriend.The case revolved around the words “involving a minor or ward. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:58 am by Kathy Kreps
City of New York, 14 Civ. 4142 (SDNY Feb. 5, 2016) and a related case De la Cruz v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:47 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a 10 page opinion, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Puerto Rico Juan Perez-Gimenez denied the joint motion for summary judgment in Conde-Vidal v.... [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 10:22 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a brief and straightforward per curiam opinion today in V.L. v. [read post]