Search for: "State v. City of York"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 9,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2024, 5:28 am
Shortly thereafter, the plaintiffs retained the defendant Daniel Weir and his law firm, the defendant Sacks & Sacks, LLP, to represent them, and the defendants commenced a personal injury action in New York State Supreme Court against, among others, the City of New York, which did not own, occupy, or control the site where the accident allegedly occurred. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:30 pm
Gaer, Esq.................Assn. of the Bar of the City of New York Martha L. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
“Courts may review the record to determine whether the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took a hard look at them, and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its determination (see Matter of Chinese Staff & Workers’ Assn. v Burden, 19 NY3d 922, 924; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
“Courts may review the record to determine whether the agency identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, took a hard look at them, and made a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its determination (see Matter of Chinese Staff & Workers’ Assn. v Burden, 19 NY3d 922, 924; Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 570; Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
” (People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:17 am
Crotty Saland, LLP is a criminal defense firm representing clients throughout the New York City region. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm
plans to expand the legal rights of same-sex couples who are already married, guaranteeing equality in fields ranging from the rights of debtors to individuals serving time in prison, he announced in a speech Saturday night in New York City. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:52 am
City of New York (1st Dept. 2012), the appeals court held that Ms. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:36 pm
As the Court noted in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
NYC Adminstrative Code § 10-131(b) Defendant also argues that New York City's ban on the possession of air pistols, AC § 10-131(b), violates the Second Amendment. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
Second Circuit precedent controls The Christiansen case was decided in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (i.e., New York City). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
Madden v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
In South Carolina v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
"The plaintiff failed to allege any facts from which malice could be inferred and [her] conclusory allegations of malice were insufficient to overcome the privilege" (Red Cap Valet v Hotel Nikko [USA], 273 AD2d 289, 290; see Rohrlich v Consolidated Bus Tr., Inc., 15 AD3d at 562; Serratore v American Port Servs., 293 AD2d 464; Freidman v Ergin, 110 AD2d 620, affd 66 NY2d 645; see also Breytman v Olinville Realty, LLC, 54 AD3d 703, 704; Baker… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:02 pm
Ford Motor Co., et al. (120954/2000; In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, Index No. 40000/88).] [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
“Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty claim, to the extent it arises from Ciacci’s suggestion that plaintiff and his wife seek funding for their personal injury action against nonparty City of New York and related parties (see Kurtzman v Bergstol, 40 AD3d 588, 590 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
