Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 4461 - 4480
of 9,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 8:38 am
While the letter is the second by the House Republican leaders asking the Governor to join Kentucky as they appeal the case of Baze v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:55 pm
In a brief opinion, the Court substantially adopted the Appellate Division’s reasoning in Wild v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
But, while the word ‘shall' is often mandatory, particularly when used in legislation, it has, depending on the context, been interpreted on occasion as directory or exhortatory only: see for example R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Back in 1986, in Ford v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Shades of Doctor Frankenstein. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:27 am
This Court in Samuel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Kitzhaber, MD, Governor of the State of Oregon, hereby grant Gary D. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
Is all still not well after Omega v Costco? [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:42 am
U.S. (10-7387) — federal judge’s power to set federal sentence to run consecutively to future state sentence Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:21 am
Rayshawn KeyNASSAU COUNTYContractsCourt Dismisses Some of Doctor's Affirmative Defenses; Single, Conclusory Sentences InsufficientFalk v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment NYU Denied Judgment on Liability on Retaliatory Discharge Claim; Issues Exist on Doctor's Back Pay Pay Pal v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A subsequent evaluation by a County-appointed doctor in September 2009 reached the same conclusion. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Robert Frederick, a doctor at Nazareth, to stop doing business with it. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:48 am
The recent opinion in Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:15 am
App.2005) and Calvert v. [read post]
