Search for: "Human v. State" Results 4501 - 4520 of 19,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
  Well, here’s the thing: Both Mitt Romney and Rick Perry, when governors, had reasonably humane immigration policies (to the extent that states can have immigration policies), but each has tried to run away from his record in the GOP primary race. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 8:34 pm by Cindy Cohn
Let's send a message to Member States at the United Nations and wherever else folks are tackling surveillance law reform: surveillance law can no longer ignore our human rights. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm by Karen Gullo
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the court in… [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am by Conor McEvily
Joe Palazzolo of the Wall Street Journal Law Blog reports that Antoine Jones, the respondent in United States v. [read post]
(Editor’s Note: The statement below is collectively signed by 22 former United Nations Special Rapporteurs and former UN experts in the field of human rights on the situation in Rafah and the obligations of UN Member States.) [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
Update: I made most of these points in Outline on this morning’s Morning Ireland ( here - from Minute 13) The question on everyone’s lips this morning is ‘Is the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in A, B & C v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:21 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Nowicki v Labourer’s International Union of North America (LIUNA) Local 1059 (“Nowicki”), the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario found that an employer’s offer of retirement, although it was an explicit attempt to remove an employee from her office, was not discriminatory under the Human Rights Code (“Code“) because it was not based upon her age or a disability. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
In the May 2014 hearing before the Supreme Court that dealt with consequential matters, counsel for the Respondents submitted that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, the court (as a public body) has a duty to exercise its discretion in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights (the “Convention”). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Constitutional theory speaks of these distinguishing values/premises in terms of democracy, human rights and dignity, sustainability, and the like. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
In a per curiam summary reversal, the United States Supreme Court held in Spears v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:18 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh As we noted in a previous blog entry, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two companion cases, Sebelius v. [read post]