Search for: "Lee v. Lee" Results 4501 - 4520 of 7,966
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
UPDATED: The Week in Wild West Shows: Free Speech, Dueling & Other Manly Arts.
24 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm by JD Hull
Burr v. [read post]
What About Paris? - http://www.whataboutclients.com/
Received a patent in the past 7 months? Act quickly to take advantage of possible term adjustment.
24 Jan 2014, 6:31 am by Jim Singer
 A new court decision (Novartis AG v. [read post]
IP Spotlight - http://ipspotlight.com
Unhappy Holidays for Untimely Appeals
23 Jan 2014, 11:44 am
Lee (Dec. 19, 2013) [untimely appeal from voluntary dismissal after summary adjudication] (citing Kurwa v. [read post]
Southern California Appellate News - http://socal-appellate.blogspot.com/
Foreign law in American courts: Could it jeopardize American constitutional rights?
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
Lee, 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1870). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
New Structured Sentencing Handbook
23 Jan 2014, 7:56 am by Jamie Markham
Lee, __ N.C. [read post]
North Carolina Criminal Law Blog - http://nccriminallaw.sog.unc.edu/
Novartis v. Lee: The Unfortunate and Unintended Impact of the PTA Statute on Continuation Practice
23 Jan 2014, 6:15 am by Eric Guttag
In Novartis, this Federal Circuit panel (opinion by Judge Taranto, joined by Judges Newman and Dyk) ruled that the second exclusion from PTA in the “B period” portion (i.e., 35 U.S.C. [read post]
IPWatchdog.com | Patent Copyright Trademark - http://www.ipwatchdog.com
Novartis v. Lee: The Unfortunate and Unintended Impact of the PTA Statute on Continuation Practice
23 Jan 2014, 6:15 am by Eric Guttag
In Novartis, this Federal Circuit panel (opinion by Judge Taranto, joined by Judges Newman and Dyk) ruled that the second exclusion from PTA in the “B period” portion (i.e., 35 U.S.C. [read post]
IPWatchdog - http://www.ipwatchdog.com/
Knowledge is Power: How the NSA bulk data seizure program is like gun registration
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm by Randy Barnett
In the “good old days” of Smith v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Hobby Lobby Part IV: The Myth of Underinclusiveness
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am by Marty Lederman
  And in Gillette v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
More information on the Novartis v. Lee Change in Patent Term Adjustment
19 Jan 2014, 9:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch The outcome of the Novartis v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Law and Media Round Up – 20 January 2014
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”, Phil Lee, Field Fisher Waterhouse Privacy and Information Law Blog. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - http://inforrm.wordpress.com
More information on the Novartis v. Lee Change in Patent Term Adjustment
19 Jan 2014, 3:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch The outcome of the Novartis v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Immigration Status: New Maryland Case on Admissibility at Trial
17 Jan 2014, 7:23 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Figeroa v. [read post]
Maryland Injury Lawsuit Information Center - http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/
How Rational Basis (D)evolved Into A Get Out Of The Constitution Free Card
16 Jan 2014, 11:08 pm by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Railway v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Novartis AG v. Lee: Appeal of Pre-AIA Patent Term Adjustment Determination
16 Jan 2014, 7:31 pm
Lee, No. 2013-1160, -1179 (Fed. [read post]
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org
25 casos de la Corte Suprema en 2013
16 Jan 2014, 2:14 pm by Gustavo Arballo
La historia lo registrará además como el primer caso resuelto efectivamente por vía del per saltum que se había introducido via ley en 2012 (y via jurisprudencia en 1990). [read post]
Saber Leyes No Es Saber Derecho - http://www.saberderecho.com/
Federal Court in Alabama Rules That Non-Compete Signed Prior to Employment is Void
16 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Daniel P. Hart
In Dawson v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Novartis AG v. Lee (Fed. Cir. 2014)
15 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- In an opinion issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit affirmed a determination by the District Court for the District of Columbia that challenges of patent term adjustment (PTA) determinations by the U.S. [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
Federal Circuit Splits The Baby In Patent Term Adjustment Decision
15 Jan 2014, 1:45 pm by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Lee, Nos. 2013-1160, -1179 (Jan. 15, 2014); see also Exelixis v. [read post]
PharmaPatents - http://www.pharmapatentsblog.com
CAFC addresses patent term adjustment in Novartis v. Lee
15 Jan 2014, 10:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Michelle Lee. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/