Search for: "M v. M" Results 4501 - 4520 of 53,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Paul Munter
One of the recent central themes of the Office of the Chief Accountant[1] has been that high-quality audits are foundational to the trust that underlies capital markets.[2] High-quality audits protect investors, instill shareholder confidence in the quality of the financial information, and enable public companies to raise capital efficiently.[3] The investor protection afforded by high-quality audits is as important to U.S. investors in foreign companies that participate in the U.S. capital markets… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:46 am
But when he takes a brief look at the merits to see if there's clear error, I'm not at all confident that he's right when he says:"Here, Gallo/Wynne argued on behalf of Objector Vasquez that the proposed settlement 'is not fair, it is not adequate, and it is not reasonable,' and that it should therefore be denied. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 7:18 am by Alden Abbott
This conclusion is buttressed by the tenor of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2021 opinion in AMG Capital v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Law Society of Ontario v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 12:42 am by Florian Mueller
The ITC SEP case still looks very interesting, the Colombian injunction continues to be enforced, and next week the Munich I Regional Court will hold a first hearing in an Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:16 pm
But now that I've read it, when the prosecutor politely sends me a letter asking me to voluntarily show up to court in order to save the state the time and hassle of arresting me, I'm definitely going to tell them to pound sand. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]