Search for: "THU L" Results 4501 - 4520 of 12,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
  Others thought only licensing litigation should be included, thus excluding validity and infringement.What is the EU's position? [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 1:04 am
These were the issues at the centre of Bastei Lübbe, C-149/17, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Germany.BackgroundThe referral was made in the context of litigation between Bastei Lübbe, a German phonogram producer, and Michael Strotzer, the owner of an internet connection through which an infringement was committed in 2010. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am by Law Lady
Federal Election Commission, excess spending subsidy imposes substantial burden on nonparticipating candidate's right of free speech and is thus subject to strict scrutiny, which requires that Florida justify the subsidy by establishing that it furthers a compelling state interest -- Even if subsidy furthers stated interest of Florida by encouraging participation in public financing system and indirectly preventing corruption or appearance of corruption, excess spending subsidy is not… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
"[8] In Europe, the term, "gray market" applies to goods sold outside the European Economic Area (hereinafter "EEA") and then re-imported against the wishes of their copyright holder.[9] The gray market has the potential to harm more than just the reputation of the goods being sold, although reputational harm has served as the basis for most innovators' arguments.[10] When a manufacturer sells goods to distributors abroad, it often does so at prices… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
’774 patent col. 2 l. 58–col. 4 l. 38 (ex parte reexamination certificate). [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The dissent opined that "when PERB's interpretation of the [S]ide [L]etter [A]greement is afforded the deference it is due, its determination that the [Racing] Board met its burden of establishing that it satisfied its duty to negotiate with [PEF] is rational and not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:55 am by John Lewis
  Thus, Oxford Health Plans reached the Court under significantly different circumstances than the Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 9:28 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(For more on this topic, check out an article co-authored by securities lawyers, Gregory L. [read post]