Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 4541 - 4560 of 40,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 1:30 am by CMS
Mr Hastings brought a claim under the CPA, s 2 which imposes strict liability on producers (meaning the pursuer does not need to prove the producer was at fault) if personal injury is caused by a defective product. [read post]
19 May 2022, 12:48 pm by Benjamin Herbst
  It does not matter if the defendant actually served jail time on the prior disqualifying crime, as the only thing that matters is the statutory maximum. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “‘In addition, it does not appear Rule 3.7 applies at this stage of the case,’ Judge Ray said of the relevant rule. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:24 am by Brittany Williams
Specifically, the defendant did not (1) previously peremptorily challenge the juror; or (2) state in his motion to renew his challenge for cause that he would have challenged that juror peremptorily had his challenges not been exhausted. (2) The defendant’s next argument on appeal was that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his confession. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
To sum up, those who try to defend the legal viability of the UPC without amending the treaties after Brexit not only read into art. 3 PPA and art. 89 UPC Agreement (“UPCA”) meaning that is not there, they also read art. 77 VCLT as saying something that it does not actually say. 2. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Patentee’s typically prefer to avoid 112(f) classification as the result is typically either (1) narrow claim scope or (2) invalid claims. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:31 am by Jonathan Bailey
McFree, who does not live in the United States, attempted to fight those, but was limited by both distance and finances. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am by Crispin Smith
Editors’ note: This article is the sixth installment in our Still at War Symposium, which can be accessed here. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Reasons for the Judgment This appeal concerns two sentencing policies: (1) to benefit from the maximum sentencing discount a defendant must indicate their intention to plead guilty at the earliest opportunity, and (2) the discount where a defendant has been caught red-handed should not generally be as great as those where a viable defence is possible. [read post]
It is based on their recent paper, “Does the Threat of Securities Class Actions Add Value for Shareholders? [read post]
17 May 2022, 7:57 am
The impact is a preclusion of the defendant’s statements if the defendant was not free to leave. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:04 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/610.5(c) Illinois courts will not even hear a motion to modify parenting responsibilities for 2 years after an order is entered. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
Mankowski: Whom has the appeal under Art. 49 (2) Brussels Ibis Regulation to be (formally) lodged with in Germany? [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:38 pm by Michael Gordon and John L. Culhane, Jr.
”  The immigrants’ limited English proficiency was the basis of a claim by the CFPB that the defendants engaged in abusive acts and practices in violation of the CFPA’s UDAAP prohibition. [read post]