Search for: "Wells v. Place"
Results 4541 - 4560
of 32,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 4:00 am
Here, however, the School District’s hiring policy was viewed as placing greater value on promoting and transferring current employees within the School District rather than simply considering "experience. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
I assume a standard disclaimer (which Model Mayhem likely had in place) is insufficient; it seems like the court was talking about websites having to provide specific warnings. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
Summum (2009) (applying the government speech doctrine to privately donated monuments placed in a public park). [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
Even Justice Alito--who dissented in Obergefell and might well want to overrule it now--does not want to overrule Zablocki v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
Reagan, Cooper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] DigiProtect USA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
I think that advice is probably true for celebrities and power users as well. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
My FindLaw column, which will appear (here) later today, discusses the case of United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 3:44 am
So says Dorfman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:44 pm
Specifically, in Wagoner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
In the recent case of Ranson v Customer Systems Plc, the Court of Appeal considers whether behaviour of a senior employee during his notice period in taking steps to compete with his employer was in breach of his duty of fidelity and whether there existed a fiduciary duty which would have placed stricter obligations on the employee. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:35 am
In the case of Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Semifinalists Members of the and third-place and fourth-place finalist teams will each receive a $100 Amazon.com gift card. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:30 pm
US v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:39 am
The claims against the supermarket were dismissed well before trial on a motion for summary judgment. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
