Search for: "American Sales Corporation v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 715
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
Supreme Court adopted a clear “transactional test” to the extraterritoriality of Rule 10b-5, which restricts such claims to situations involving “the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States”. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am
H.R. 3606 also exempts emerging growth companies from two new corporate governance requirements that were established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Instead the Supreme Court held that Section 10(b) reaches frauds only where “the purchase or sale is made in the United States, or involves a security listed on a domestic exchange” (see our dozen plus postings concerning this seminal decision and cases decided since; search under “Morrison” in the Search box of this blog). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:19 pm
As I prepare to teach Dodge v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
United States, 362 U. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:18 pm
Corporate VeilIt is as easy to state that the origin of the separate entity principle is often traced to Salomon v Salomon as it is difficult to outline when a court will lift the veil. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
In a case concerning an individual sale agreement to this master agreement, a German court should – in most cases – hold the law of the place of residence of the seller applicable and determine the place of jurisdiction in the exact same manner as it does in case of an ordinary sale agreement. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
However much the Chinese and American governments may have agreed to collaborate in green technologies and support the development of related industries, the trade laws, particularly in the United States where there is no public interest exception, would limit their ability to do so. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
However much the Chinese and American governments may have agreed to collaborate in green technologies and support the development of related industries, the trade laws, particularly in the United States where there is no public interest exception, would limit their ability to do so. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:05 am
See Mazza, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued two decisions last year that are likely to increase the number of retaliation lawsuits because they expand the scope of protection. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Definition of gross estate for RIC stock owned by a nonresident not a citizen of the United States (sec. 2105(d))67. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Then this past September, I believe, both he and Kramer got shut down by the State Bar and AG, the allegations being that they were “running and capping,” essentially meaning that they were paying non-lawyers sales commissions. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
In 1977, Cubic International Sales Corporation, predecessor in interest to appellant Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. [read post]
