Search for: "C. H. v. Attorney General United States" Results 441 - 460 of 561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Seek Lawful Nonimmigrant Status without leaving the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm by Michael Lowe
United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), as: a misappropriation of funds that enriches a person of power or influence who uses the power or influence to make a different individual, organization, or company richer. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
  If one accepts the criteria for targeting a U.S. citizen set forth in the Attorney General’s speech a year ago, it has several parts: [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Collyer compels a number of unknown communications companies to comply with directives issued by the Attorney General and the DNI, presumably in assisting with surveillance. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”  If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch)   Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and then… [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
  Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]