Search for: "Company v. Review Board"
Results 441 - 460
of 5,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2010, 10:59 am
Building Service 32 BJ Pension Fund, that, like insurance companies, Taft-Hartley funds are inherently conflicted when making benefit determinations, and that this conflict needs to be considered by federal district courts when reviewing plan determinations under an arbitrary and capricious standard of review. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:39 am
EGCs would still comply with corporate governance and listing requirements including board member independence rules; (vi) Provides for more communications and information flow to investors and special provisions for providing draft registration statements for non-public review. [read post]
25 May 2017, 7:35 pm
Estate of Morris Blackburn (10th Cir., May 23, 2017) (affirming Black Lung Benefits compensation claim and denying petition for review: the Labor Benefits Review Board did not err in affirming the award below)*Hays v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 12:15 pm
The first one addressed the legality of Board of Appeal’s hearings by video conference: the corresponding referral has now been referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:52 pm
The Justices will consider whether to hear Jump Rope Sys., LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:52 pm
The Justices will consider whether to hear Jump Rope Sys., LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 2:42 pm
Jubilee Carolina, LLC v Town of Carolina Beach, 2019 WL 5206274 (NC App. 10/15/2019) [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:58 pm
Ex-Employee and Founder of Company Filed Wrongful Dismissal Action After Termination In the case of Leroux v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:58 pm
Ex-Employee and Founder of Company Filed Wrongful Dismissal Action After Termination In the case of Leroux v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
” Slip op. 10-11 (quoting Pepper v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm
Demand Futility Under Court of Chancery Rule 23.1 The Court reviewed the familiar standard for demand futility under Aronson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Flynn 81,833 170,000 - 7,500 259,333 Ellen V. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS Using the Congressional Review Act (CRA), the U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 8:59 am
Williams v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:57 am
” Because a company may incur Section 16(b) liability by deputizing a natural person to perform its duties on the board, such a company may also invoke the exemption if the board is aware of the deputization. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:54 am
Rose v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
Thus, the 10-K prepared by one attorney but reviewed by Weisberg "omitted any mention of SALTSMAN or EITAN's role in the change in Ramp's board of directors. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
