Search for: "Davis v. Bear" Results 441 - 460 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
- Chancery Div rules in a trade secret case relating to technical information: Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others (IPKat) EWHC (Ch) finds actionable breach of confidence in case concerning stolen invoices: JN Dairies Ltd v Johal Dairies Ltd, Gurbir Singh (IPKat) Advertising Standards Authority condemns wrongful use of Volvo log by an unauthorised Volvo dealership (Class 46) Banksy – an unlikely copyright ambassador? [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Sandoz Inc., 15-1195), and cases involving trial before nonlawyer judges (Davis v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am by S
They were also of the view that the fact that someone was not homeless within the meaning of Part 7 had no bearing whatsoever on whether the accommodation was their dwelling. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am by Tejinder Singh
Bennett (echoing the pre-CU decision in FEC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 3:45 pm by Giles Peaker
It is important that it was a request for an administrative issue of warrant, bear with me. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Presented by Tess Davis.Going beyond the armed conflicts of the 1940's, lawyer and archaeologist Tess Davis, executive director of the Antiquities Coalition highlighted lessons learned from Cambodia, where severe cultural property looting lasted from 1970 through 1998. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm by MOTP
A party moving for traditional summary judgment bears the burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 They dismissed the defendant’s appeal against Dingemans J’s decision that the words complained of were capable of bearing a defamatory meaning. [read post]