Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS CORP" Results 441 - 460 of 1,435
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2015, 8:19 pm
Toyota, Subaru, General Motors, Nissan, and Mitsubishi later joined these manufacturers in recalling autos with possibly defective passenger-side air bags. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:01 am by Eric Goldman
Amazon.com, Inc., 456 F.3d 1316, 1322-324 (11th Cir. 2006); Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
National Screen Service Corp. and Zenith Radio Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:49 am by Bob Kraft
Bloomberg News reported that, thanks to massive safety recalls this year by General Motors and Takata Corp., vehicle recalls in 2014 “surpassed the 60 million mark for the first time in a single year,” with the number of vehicles recalled in the US so far this year hitting 60.5 million vehicles, “almost double the previous annual record of 30.8 million recalled vehicles set in 2004. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:46 pm by Associated Press
The Japanese automaker sold 10.23 million vehicles, beating out Volkswagen and General Motors. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am by Michael Markarian
In part, this is because the public demand for a more humane future for animals is strong enough to generate real results in Washington. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Motors Corp., 32 F.3d 1007,1008 (7th Cir. 1994) Arguably, the crediting of the reasoning of Dr. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Leinweber Co., Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Co., and ExxonMobil Oil Corp. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Similarly, how the driver operated the bus was something routinely examined by courts in motor vehicle negligence cases. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm by Michael Markarian
In part, this is because the public demand for a more humane future for animals is strong enough to generate real results in Washington. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The controversy that quickly followed over fee-shifting bylaws seemed headed for a swift resolution when the Delaware General Assembly quickly moved to enact on a measure that would have limited the Supreme Court’s ruling to non-stock corporations (meaning that it wouldn’t apply to Delaware stock corporations). [read post]