Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
Stuart Hale Co., 1 F.3d 611, 618 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:59 pm
Indiana Asserts Jurisdiction Over Ohio LawyerFoley v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
See Ammerman v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Patmalniece (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 11 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that pensioners from other European Union states should not have the right to claim pension credits in the UK. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 12:11 pm
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Had they done so, Her Ladyship stated that she would have agreed with the minority decision in that case. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Cuomo v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
United States, Shaw v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 4-3 majority (Hale, Kerr and Phillips dissenting). [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) David Leroy Hale v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
Lady Hale gives a separate concurring judgment. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:35 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:24 pm
VSIM Patent Co., LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
As Baroness Hale said at paragraph 73: It is not statute, but the common law, indeed the rule of law itself, which imposes upon the Secretary of State the duty to comply with his own stated policy, unless he has a good reason to depart from it in the particular case at the particular time. [read post]
