Search for: "In Re Best Products Co., Inc." Results 441 - 460 of 926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2013) – all of which also travel under the heading, In re Neurontin Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
 In re Rezulin Products Liability Litig., 309 F.Supp. 2d 531, 541 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
Hein & Co., Inc., HeinOnline includes nearly 100 million pages of legal history available in an online, fully-searchable, image-based format. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Appellants have failed to do so.Footnote 2 cites to In re Best:See In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255 (CCPA 1977) (“Where, as here, theclaimed and prior art products are identical or substantially identical, or areproduced by identical or substantially identical processes, the PTO canrequire an applicant to prove that the prior art products do not necessarily orinherently possess the characteristics of his claimed product. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416 (2007). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chicago Tribune Co., 267 F.3d 628 (7th Cir. 2001), should control. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2012), citing KSR Int’l Co. v.Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 418-421 (2007) (“A reference may be read forall that it teaches, including uses beyond its primary purpose. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:46 am by Jeffrey P. Hermes
For example, in Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:27 pm by Bexis
Guardian Drug Co., No. 12 CV 7778 (VB), slip op. [read post]