Search for: "In re: James Smith" Results 441 - 460 of 909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Osler Law School Innovation Boston F Linda McClain Balkinization Boston M Kevin Outterson The Incidental Economist Boston College M Brian JM Quinn M&A Law Prof Blog Brooklyn M Derek Bambauer  Info/Law Brooklyn M Adam Kolber Neuroethics & Law Blog Brooklyn F Robin Effron Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Blog Brooklyn M Jason Mazzone Balkinization BYU M Gordon Smith Conglomerate … [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:13 pm by Rick Hasen
Ultimately, the question of substantial conformity, and the decision as to whether two names match – say, for example “James Smith” and “Jim Smith” – will be left to those individual boards of elections, and ultimately to the individual poll workers. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Smith & Wesson semiautomatic rifle. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:57 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/NHdtDb (Greg Jacobs) Privacy and Security Surrounding The Cloud - Article 29 Working Paper Guidance - http://bit.ly/M3L5MS (Kate Gorey) Race to the HighCourt: Hoosier Racing Seeks High Court Review of Third Circuit’s Slashing of eDiscovery Cost Award – http://bit.ly/OAsPKX (Mark Sidoti) Recruiter Misuse of Social Media Can Increase Risk of Liability - http://bit.ly/LVVfPE (Alexander Nemiroff) Re-Thinking and Rejecting… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:52 pm by SO Issues
"By that logic, Congress would have never-ending jurisdiction to regulate anyone who was ever convicted of a federal crime of any sort, no matter how long ago he served his sentence, because he may pose a risk of re-offending," Smith added. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:50 pm
James Waller, Billy James Smith, Johnnie Lindsey and Thomas McGowan have recently launched the Exonerated Brothers of Texas, a nonprofit group that provides support services to at-risk youth and exonerees. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
  During April, I hoped fervently – and, as it turned out, incorrectly – that the Supreme Court would take up James Harmon’s rent control case, where had it done so rent control would have been overturned, for the reasons outlined in Correcting Yee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 10:05 am by CAPTAIN
Here now is our answer: We think they're a bunch of losers with no heart. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:29 am by Richard Renner
Second, she must immediately pay taxes but we’re not going to even factor that in. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:24 am by Steven Berk
  Second, she must immediately pay taxes but we’re not going to even factor that in. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
I don’t think there’s anything particularly odd about that when you’re facing such an issue. [read post]