Search for: "In re D. S." Results 441 - 460 of 67,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2020, 3:42 am
Greenbaum) [Section 2(d) refusal of PIPPA for "Paper products, namely, stationery, envelopes, printed invitations, announcement cards, note cards, and greeting cards," in view of the registered mark PIPPA & CO. for "Retail store services in the field of party supplies" [& CO. disclaimed].In re Queendom Aesthetics, LLC, Serial No. 88085646 (August 19, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:46 am
Burch DO Inc., Serial No. 888603134 (August 17, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:53 am by Kelly Creighton
Here’s what you need to know about digital transformation and L&D. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Court held that a judicial interpretation would trump an agency’s construction only if the judicial precedent “unambiguously foreclose[d] the agency’s interpretation, and therefore contain[ed] no gap for the agency to fill. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:13 am
The National Senior Citizens Law Center's Low-Income Advocate Alert on Medicare Part D, March 2008, is available online at http://www.nsclc.org/areas/medicare-part-d/area_folder.2006-09-28.4596471630. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 4:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Le revêtement revendiqué se distinguait de celui de D3 par deux caractéristiques: (i) les paillettes hydrophiles avaient un rapport de forme d'au moins 10 et (ii) la présence d'un polymère ou oligomère contenant du fluor.La Titulaire avait soumis un rapport d'essai D18 montrant qu'avec ce type de paillettes, l'utilisation d'un polymère fluoré… [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:29 pm by Joanna Pachner
Read More The post Le dilemme des FOD : Les pressions créées par la COVID-19 forceront-elles le gouvernement fédéral à revoir les règles des controversés fonds orientés par les donateurs? [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:04 am
In re Tiny Boxwood’s Holdings, LLC, Serial No. 90263427 (November 9, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis) [Section 2(d) refusal of TINYS MILK & COOKIES for, inter alia, "breads, croissants, donuts, muffins, rolls and scones" [MILK & COOKIES disclaimed] in view of the registered mark TINY'S TINY PIES for "pies" [TINY PIES disclaimed]]. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:50 am
Wellington) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark LYDIA for "Hotel services, namely, high end boutique resort hotel services" in view of the registered mark LIDIA’S KANSAS CITY for restaurant services (KANSAS CITY disclaimed)]. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:08 am
  The dissent says he does.Section D of the opinion is all about the incentive effects of today's holding. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:35 am by Glenn Reynolds
They’re looking to protect you from yourself — unless, you know, there’s a buck to be made by looking the other way. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:58 am by sylvain
Pour le Tribunal fédéral, la vidéosurveillance des parties communes d’un immeuble locatif est susceptible de porter atteinte de manière inadmissible à la sphère privée des locataires (arrêt 4A_576/2015 du 29 mars 2016). [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Charlie’s Chalk Dust, LLC, Serial No. 88417905 (February 1, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Elizabeth A. [read post]