Search for: "Jones v. No Defendants Named"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
After seeing the file names, Vandepanne informed his manager of what he saw. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
For the purposes of this case, there is “super precedent”- namely Davis, Knotts, and Karo. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
Tenney v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 7:22 am
In determining this amount, I have taken into consideration the resolution that occurred between the plaintiff and Legal Aid Ontario, who was originally named as a party defendant, but who is no longer involved in the claimThough damages for intrusion upon seclusion may range from nominal to $20,000 (per Jones v Tsige), but we may see $10,000 become the standard award.Thanks to Dan Michaluk for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
As legal types well know, he is not merely the case’s name plaintiff and lawyer. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 9:33 pm
A couple weeks ago, the Supreme Court narrowly denied cert in Jones v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
United States, 131 S.Ct. 2419 (2011), the Court held that the agents acted in accordance with Abinding appellate precedent,@ namely the Supreme Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
That number included 374 jihadists, 268 Kurdish defenders, and 20 civilians. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Finally, as Lyle reported yesterday, the Court denied review in Jones v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:17 pm
Magistrate judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, Thomas Rawles Jones Jr., issued an order in Whoshere, Inc., v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 1:09 pm
In that case, Shapero v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 10:38 am
Jones, and the defendant, Ms. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am
The decision to introduce evidence was not a fundamental decision reserved to defendant, but a strategic or tactical decision for his attorney (see People v Jones, 41 AD3d 242, 243 [1st Dept 2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 923 [2007]). [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:23 am
Jones and Riley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 9:01 am
Jones’ Argument The defense divided its time between Jones’ lawyer and the office of the Cuyahoga County Public Defender. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm
§ 2254(g) and Jones v. [read post]
