Search for: "Ohio v. Roberts"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2017, 8:18 pm
Thomas Munsterman Award The Detroit News published an article by former Michigan Chief Justice Robert P. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In 1976, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
On a 5-4 vote, Shaw v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio in 1984 held in Gross v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 9:06 am
In 1981, in Rostker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 11:56 am
Brandt, Robert N. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm
Professor Volokh is concerned about an unusual development in Brummer v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Circuit’s ruling in Jaber v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
Lemen (Cal. 2007); Hill v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
I thought I’d pass along the bulk of our memorandum in support of a preliminary injunction, in case people are interested; it’s based on a challenge to a similar Ohio law filed by Ohio lawyer Ray Vasvari and my students Ashford Kneitel, Ryan Nielsen and Elizabeth Sweeney and me several weeks ago. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Robert M. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm
” Coker v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
The states of Oregon and Texas fought the Voting Rights Act provision and a divided Supreme Court, in Oregon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
(For example, Weinhoeft v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:06 pm
Roberts, no dissenter).En promulguant N. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:52 am
Peruta v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 4:18 am
Phillip Randolph Institute, which asks whether Ohio’s process for removing voters from registration lists violates federal election laws, “has given pause to voting rights advocates,” because despite “recent wins against gerrymandering efforts inNorth Carolina and Virginia, voting rights have not fared well before the Roberts Court. [read post]
