Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 441 - 460 of 4,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2023, 11:08 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  Even so, "although the Buchanan/Dorf approach does not in any way depend on the Fourteenth Amendment, we don't disagree with the Fourteenth Amendment argument. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:00 am by Michael Geist
I’m a law professor at the University of Ottawa where I hold the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law and I’m a member of the Centre for Law, Technology and Society. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress passed amendments in 1996 to the securities laws that included a new exception from registration allowing private funds to have an unlimited number of qualified investors.[1] That same 1996 law included an important provision that SEC rulemaking had to consider efficiency and competition as well as capital formation, in addition to investor protection and the public interest. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
Kenneth Simon Chair in Constitutional Studies at the Cato Institute, a position I hold in addition to my primary job as a law professor at George Mason University. [read post]
1 May 2023, 11:46 am by Jackie Gardina, J.D.
Vigilante Federalism Our second guest, Rutgers Law School professor David Noll, J.D., provided examples of the dangers of supermajorities to pass legislation that undermines fundamental rights. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Speakers include Professor Norman Doe; Morag Ellis KC; The Revd Alexander McGregor; Edward Dobson; and The Revd Stephen Coleman. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This post comes to us from Professor Mark Kubisch at Pepperdine University’s Caruso School of Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Nor do their interests appear to focus on what has become most important to me personally, which is the undemocratic nature of the structures imposed on the United States by the 1787 Constitution, which has been barely amended since then. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
Second, Plaintiff's privacy interests in this case predominate the presumption that judicial records be open to the public. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In my column last Thursday, I cited a Verdict column by Illinois Law’s Dean Vik Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
“It appears that disinformation itself is on trial,” said media law professor Jonathan Peters in the Washington Post. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Second, basing liability solely on the objective reasonableness of the recipient’s reaction represents a negligence standard.... [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
David Erdos is Professor of Law and the Open Society and Co-Director of the Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law in the Faculty of Law and al [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Second, to carry out the rescue, the Swiss government passed an Emergency Ordinance on March 16, 2023 (amended on March 19). [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the… [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:41 am by John Floyd
In writing for the Court, Justice Scalia said, “Where testimonial evidence is at issue, however, the Sixth Amendment demands what the common law required: unavailability and a prior opportunity for cross-examination. [read post]