Search for: "People v. Levins" Results 441 - 460 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      In April 2007, the Supreme Court ruled in Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
After Parker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 3:46 pm by Jeff Lipshaw
Last spring, in another forum, I blogged extensively about the SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
A new report has said that an artificial intelligence watchdog should be set up to make sure people are not discriminated against by the automated computer systems making important decisions about their lives. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
Mitchell Silk, Rebecca Perkins, Henry Levine and Andrew Worden, discussants. 19 Cardozo J. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At OurFuture.org, Sam Pizzigati argues that in Janus v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   If most of the people I write about are extremists, then postwar movement conservatism -- and perhaps conservatism per se -- are extremist. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
There are exemptions to these provisions for people in specified categories as long as they have no symptoms. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
Levin, a satellite television provider is challenging the constitutionality of an Ohio law that imposes greater taxes on it than on cable television companies doing business in that state, while in Sandy Creek Energy Associates v. [read post]