Search for: "People v. Royale"
Results 441 - 460
of 862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2015, 12:13 pm
Royal Caribbean. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
Straightforwardly unlawful. b. is, I presume, based upon a misapprehension of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 [our report]. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
The Trademark Blog: “Mandatory Zut Alors Pun Here” Being the kind of people we were, we assumed it “must be some trademark thingy,” and I, for one called it a night. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Well, not quite, but here's a reminder that, on 29 and 30 January 2015, you can enjoy "Trade Mark Litigation", a two-day forum organised by C5 and held in the Royal Windsor Hotel, Brussels. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:48 am
If it stands, several libraries would close their doors just as much as the internet service providers would if they are responsible for privacies diminished by others agency – comparison borrowed by the Argentinian Court from England’s Royal Court of Justice, in case Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
How long did it take for people to discover the value of inventions of Chester Carlson or Reginald Fessenden? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:04 am
Koch v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 6:33 am
“Although eradicating unlawful discrimination and protecting other as-yet undiscovered victims are laudatory goals and within the Commission’s broad mandate, the EEOC must still make the necessary showing of relevancy in attempting to enforce its subpoena,” the court said (EEOC v Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd, November 6, 2014, per curiam). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:08 am
Royal Caribbean (flowrider liability waiver is illegal), and Doe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:59 am
See, e.g., Weisenberg v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Do people really believe that the digits on the calendar determine the fate of the Bay Area baseball franchise? [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:19 am
The strange little case of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm
Instead, that evolution well illustrates marriage’s trajectory from (as Ninth Circuit Judge Marsha Berzon put it in her recent concurrence in Latta v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:59 am
The recent case of Royal Caribbean v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:34 am
These people can’t return; they’re already home. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
