Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases"
Results 441 - 460
of 9,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2014, 11:00 am
Who You Can Expect to See In Court As you likely know, from watching a little too much Law and Order perhaps, the judge is the person who presides over the court. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
Hill, examined whether the judge presiding over that case abused their authority by refusing to accept the defendant’s no-contest plea. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
All presidents lose cases. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:29 am
A third precedent is the case of federal judge West Hughes Humphries. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Magistrate Judge Reid will determine in a report and recommendation whether to reject or grant the motion for disqualification and, if the latter, whether Damian will return to preside over the case on future pre-trial motions. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
The focus of the complaint against McMunagle was not about bias, but the council determined it was “not founded. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:48 am
’ Although it is certainly the president’s prerogative to justify the exercise of his constitutional commutation power in whatever manner he chooses (or even to decline to provide a reason for his actions altogether), the Court notes that the term of incarceration imposed in this case was determined after a careful consideration of each of the requisite statutory factors. . . [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:11 am
The Telegraph and other papers have now published passages of the documents which were previously censored following this order from Vos J, the judge who has presided over more than 50 hacking claims against NGN. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 5:12 pm
Cook, the former President of the National Association of Assistant U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 8:28 am
In today's Washington Post, Alliance for Justice president Nan Aron has the OpEd, "An Unjust Judge. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
As a result, a number of cases are currently pending that may force the courts to resolve, or at least address, the constitutional contours of executive privilege that have, to date, remained unexplored by the judiciary. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:03 am
The cert petition pointed out two Hawaii cases, Robinson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
The judge will then review the record to determine whether substantial evidence supports the magistrate’s findings and whether there is any evidence that the legal conclusions are clearly erroneous. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:23 pm
But she asked the federal judge presiding over the case to grant her a trial in a bid to get sympathy from a jury because she claimed she was too young to appreciate that she was breaking the law. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:34 am
The Court was unanimous in ruling against President Nixon in the tapes case, a decision that foreseeably ended his Presidency. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:02 am
But judges are not usually called upon to make findings when they are presiding over a jury trial; their function is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a guilty verdict, a process which presupposes that the prosecution’s witnesses are believed by the trier of fact. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
First, the executive branch maintained that the courts lacked the power to order the president to produce information (either to Congress or anyone else) if he determined that the public interest required withholding. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
" Judge Ward further explained that "[w]ith respect to the Court's familiarity and experience with the patents-in-suit, due to the approaching retirement of both the undersigned and Magistrate Judge Everingham, there will no longer be a judge in the Marshall Division with familiarity of this case. [read post]
16 Sep 2006, 3:34 pm
That being the case, shouldn't President Bush's impolitic response to this reporter have been - why are you asking me about hypotheticals when you can ask me about the real world? [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 7:27 am
"A significant fraction" of the cases heard by the Court of Appeals is not clearly determined by statutes or precedent. [read post]
