Search for: "Short v. USA"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
We thought it was time for a short update. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
NSLs were one of the ways that the law fell short. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:17 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2008 ruling in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 1:15 pm
V. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 11:43 am
Commil USA, LLC v.Cisco Sys., Inc., 135 S. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:27 pm
We have agreed that some symbols, cross burnings for example (Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:58 am
The short answer is yes. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
In short, an attorney or lawfirm can avoid being sued by the client through an arbitration clause in the attorney-client agreement that covers all possible future disputes with one exception: it preserves the firm's right to sue the client to recover its costs (and by extension, its fees), which is the only plausible claim that the law firm could have against a client. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Judge Sarah Vance’s opinion in Burst v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:13 am
Next Steps While the short- and long-term implications of USA Freedom may not be as clear as we would like, there is hope. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/0nUnxIZI8c -> Legislative Short Summary Published for C-65, An Act to amend the Copyright Act (to accede to the Marrakesh treaty) http://t.co/hIoON1TIUt -> Delfi AS v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
This week's Never Too Late post -- the 49th -- is relatively short, since last week was a quiet one for the IPKat and Merpel. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
There is nothing to see but a short-term "fix" that (a) emasculates the Book of Common Prayer; (b) reverses the normal order for liturgical change; and (c) makes a mishmash of the concept of "marriage" within the Episcopal Church (USA). [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:11 pm
In Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
This question is likely still haunting Cisco following yesterday's US Supreme Court defeat in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems, Inc (2015).In a 6-2 vote (Justice Breyer was recused), the highest court in the United States overturned the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that held that the Cisco could run the "good faith" defence against Commil's claims that Cisco directly infringed its patent for a method of implementing… [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
The statement we quoted back in 2009, uttered by the first person ever to have his genome individually sequenced, that “individual genes are just not very informative,” appears in the process of being disproven by ongoing scientific events.Both items, as informative as they were on scientific facts, were rather short on the law. [read post]
16 May 2015, 3:17 pm
"[V]ague platitudes about a facility's 'crucial role in the national defense' are not enough to convict a defendant of sabotage. [read post]
16 May 2015, 6:55 am
Circuit in Klayman v. [read post]