Search for: "Light v. United States"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 11,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
On the contrary, she prevailed against the plaintiffs' claims.April 23, 2007, Decision and Order Denying RIAA Reconsideration Motion*For those of you interested in reading more from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fogerty v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
Davis appealed, and during that appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided the employer-friendly, anti-class action case, Dukes. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
” United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:25 am
After observing that Stall had no criminal history and properly determining that the Sentencing Guidelines advised a range of 57-71 months of imprisonment, the district court sentenced Stall to only one day of incarceration and a ten-year period of supervised release.1 In this appeal, the United States contends this "non-custodial" sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
I was certain that Johnson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
United States, in which the court will decide next term “what constitutes criminal “computer misuse” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:28 am
United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 (1996). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:43 pm
In the recent case of United States District Court v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:57 pm
While this litigation is notable in that it is shedding light on risks potentially associated with AstraZeneca’s Covid vaccines, it is not possible for individuals and families in the United States to file similar lawsuits. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
From an administrative law standpoint, this case is potentially significant because it could clarify the Court's demarcation in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/02/10-10009.pdf United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
AT&T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm
It’s a pretty light lift this week because the first two cases involve precisely the same question. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
You can, if you are interested, read more about habeas procedure in the United States in the article you can find here. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
They did in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Because the art market is opaque, diligence is needed to discover an object's true chain of custody, transfer, and ownership.The latest court case demonstrating the need for due diligence is United States v. [read post]
