Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 4601 - 4620
of 5,779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The confiscation order’s interference with Art. 1 Protocol 1 The first step of the ECtHR’s analysis required the assessment of whether the Getty Trust could claim a proprietary interest in Victorious Youth in the first place and whether the confiscation measure could interfere with such right. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices spar with counsel over excluding securities litigation from state courts
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Justice Sotomayor commented that she “just d[id]n’t understand how” Section 27 barred the New Jersey court from hearing the case. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:29 am
" I'd recommend visiting your local library and asking for help researching older cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
[D.] [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
Preemption is a matter of federal law overriding state law, so it’s logical to think that state judges may have a different perspective than federal ones. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:50 pm
It’s the game where laws don’t matter and all the houses go back to the bank no matter what! [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Poulter, “Reference Guide on Medical Testimony,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 439, 476 & n. 136 (2d ed. 2000). [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
`For one dollar, the Lucky Shamrock dispense[d] a two[-]minute emergency long[-] distance calling card, good only for one call no matter the time actually used. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:16 pm
Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), John Thune (R-SD), Roger Wicker (R-MS), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), introduced the bipartisan Senate Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act establishing “a framework to bolster innovation while bringing greater transparency, accountability, and security to the development and operation of the highest-impact applications of AI. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:49 pm
Ruling of the Case: Although the Hodari D. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
(Nothing clarifies matters at the Alor.com website, by the way.) [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am
(By the way, there’s also the matter of service of process. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
D.C. 179, 185 n.6, 348 F.2d 791, 797 n.6 (1965). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
N. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am
How should trial judges handle the matter? [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am
How should trial judges handle the matter? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:22 pm
§ 2254(d)(1)? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Schroter, N. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 5:19 am
All I know about the facts in the case is that “[o]n On August 8, 2012, . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
If you’d like to know more about pendent jurisdiction, check out the Wikipedia entry you can find here. [read post]
