Search for: "F. v. R." Results 4621 - 4640 of 20,305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
(Najim v London Borough of Enfield [2015] EWCA Civ 319; [2015] HLR 19) (…) The proper approach to be derived from such authorities, and Tranckle (R v Exeter City Council, ex p. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
Ficeto, 677 F.3d 60, 67 (2d Cir. 2012)). [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:16 pm by Jim Gerl
 See, Questions and Answers on Secondary Transition 57 IDELR 231 (OSERS 9/1/11); In Park Hill Sch Dist v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Senate HELP Committee Chair Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) promised the committee would move promptly on the nominations. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]