Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 4641 - 4660
of 5,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Example: Texas AG's action against Joseph Onwuteaka and his debt collection firm over mandatory venue violations: State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In its recent case, FDA v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:43 pm
” In May 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) confronted a contentious case, State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 12:43 pm
” In May 2022, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) confronted a contentious case, State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Mosteller, Harry R. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
What are states going to do? [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:42 am
” This was the famous dissent given by Associate Justice Harry Blackmun in the DeShaney v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:43 pm
’” To view video of the relevant portion of Koh’s address to the Society, visithttp://fora.tv/v/10561. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:12 pm
The Court’s decision in FDA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Change in use would matter—commercializing the Harry Potter Encyclopedia. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
#5: Harris v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 8:42 am
Hartigan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 2:20 am
These recalls are not the end of all importing and manufacturing relations between the two countries, and fault finding should be placed aside to be superceded by concerns for public safety. [27] V. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
For example in Walker v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
