Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 9,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 5:39 pm
Through the first half of 2015, merger objection case filings have declined by 35 percent compared to the first half of 2014. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
The Massachusetts’ statute has been amended a number of times and can be found in the Massachusetts General Laws in Chapter 188, Sections 1-10. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Judgment The CJEU, however, holds that article 1 (1) of the Service Regulation “must be interpreted as meaning that legal actions for compensation for disturbance of ownership and property rights, contractual performance and damages, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, brought by private persons who are holders of government bonds against the issuing State, fall within the scope of that regulation in so far as it does not appear that they are manifestly… [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:27 am
In fact, it does not differentiate between marital and non-marital income at all. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
What does “pretend” mean, especially as it is absent from subsection (b)? [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:22 am
Subdivision (a) covers "Before an Action Is Filed": (1) Petition. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:56 am
Ct. at 2359–60 (link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1506.Opinion.7-1-2015.1.PDF [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:47 am
Rule 11 Does Not Prohibit Section 285 Attorney Fees Award Against Represented Party Following dismissal of plaintiff's actions for Rule 11 violations, the court granted defendants' motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
The defendant does not have to show that he has taken the minimum necessary, however. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in John Doe I v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:42 pm
Magenheimer that the Indiana Tort Claims Act (“ITCA”) does not govern a claim under Indiana Code chapter 35-47-11.1, which prohibits political subdivisions from regulating firearms (“Indiana Firearms Preemption Act” or “IFP Act”). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:42 am
Magenheimer that the Indiana Tort Claims Act (“ITCA”) does not govern a claim under Indiana Code chapter 35-47-11.1, which prohibits political subdivisions from regulating firearms (“Indiana Firearms Preemption Act” or “IFP Act”). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
For a typical ticket, we charge $35. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:23 am
The US comes in at 41 with Singapore at no. 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
” Several court have thus interpreted the current rule in a way that does not result in automatic production of all statistical analyses performed, but only those data and analyses the witness has decided to present at trial. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
The amount of money at stake is significant, with Rank looking to reclaim around £35 million of VAT. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
” 1 Democracy in America 309 (H. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:58 pm
§ 2C:35-18. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:02 pm
Thus we affirm that claim 1 is not directed to patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
No. 104-208, § 322(a)(1) (1996), codified as 8 USC 1101(a)(48)(A). [read post]
