Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 4681 - 4700 of 178,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Jason Rantanen
If the plaintiff had sued Hyponix and NinjaSafe separately, would that have changed the court’s analysis? [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
There's got to be additional downsides as well.Serious ones, IMHO. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
[In October, t]he Court … denied, with leave to renew, Plaintiff's motion to proceed pseudonymously. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:14 am by Gelb
Meanwhile, setting up a mediation can be as quick as finding availability on the calendar of the defense counsel, the plaintiffs counsel, the mediator, and the parties in the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:14 am by Gelb
Meanwhile, setting up a mediation can be as quick as finding availability on the calendar of the defense counsel, the plaintiffs counsel, the mediator, and the parties in the case. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Bryan Hawkins and Robert Sarkisian
’”  The Court went on to recite its previous holding in a previous case discussing instances where striking a cause of action was appropriate: (1) the plaintiff has failed to prosecute diligently; or (2) the complaint has been shown to be “fictitious or [a] sham” such that the plaintiff has no valid cause of action. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am by Eric Goldman
This action triggered Defendant’s system to pre-populate a text message onto Plaintiffs phone. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Michael (Mike) S. Kun
  While some have read the decision as a resounding victory for the plaintiffs’ bar that will force every PAGA case to settle for large amounts, the decision does no such thing. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:43 am by Evan Brown
Jurisdictional Challenges Vickery moved to dismiss the case, arguing the federal court sitting in New Hampshire where plaintiff brought the suit had no personal jurisdiction over Vickery. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:21 am
That calculation by the Plaintiff included sales conducted through big-box retailers, which made up the vast majority of the California Defendant’s business. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am by Dan Bressler
” “In an unpublished opinion, the appeals court upheld a trial court ruling denying the senior care provider’s motion to disqualify law firm Castronovo & McKinney from representing the plaintiff in McCarthy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
On appeal, the trial court’s rulings were reversed in part, vacated in part, and the case was remanded. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
City and County of San Francisco (1st—A165231) Workers’ Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule—Public Employers—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, held that plaintiff firefighter employed by San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) was barred by workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule in Labor Code §§ 3600(a), 3601(a) and 3602(a) from pursuing personal injury claim against… Yalung… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
The court also noted that the Plaintiff paid a lower premium for the lower benefits as further evidence of the insured’s acceptance of the coverage provided. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Around that time, the Vice-Chancellor returned, and the school investigated and ultimately substantiated the plaintiffs complaint. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am by Aaron Moss
After much sturm und drang, the jury in that case awarded damages of only $3,750—just enough to cover plaintiffs DoorDash bills for the trial. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
”When the Orange County Supreme Court later granted the County’s motion for summary judgment (dismissing the case), the plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Will Rasenberger
Citing Judge Leval’s article, the U.S. [read post]