Search for: "MATTER OF PETERS"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 6,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
As with the tort of nuisance, the enforcement of restrictive covenants is a matter for the ordinary civil courts. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
- bit.ly/wAuPVt (Solomon Banda) Reports and Resources CNSSI-4031 Cryptographic High Value Products (CHVP) (PDF) bit.ly/xHmRPd (Committee on National Security Systems) Microsoft Paper Focuses on Evolved Security, Privacy and Reliability Strategies for Cloud and Big Data – bit.ly/yR2QpG (Scott Charney) New Federal Guidelines Promote Uniform Treatment of eDiscovery in Criminal Proceedings – bit.ly/AjW6sa (Bracewell & Giuliani) New Research Reveals Cyber… [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In the case law on this exception, institutions have generally presented two main rationales for secrecy (see Peters and Ankersmit for an overview). [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am
The guidance provides background on the USPTO’s efforts related to AI and subject matter eligibility, an overview of the USPTO’s patent subject matter eligibility guidance, and additional discussion on certain areas of the guidance that are particularly relevant to AI inventions, including discussions of Federal Circuit decisions on subject matter eligibility. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
However, it does adopt certain immunities, including from lawsuits unless authorized by Congress.[32] On the cause for unjust enrichment, the Court held that the claim did not fit the nature of unjust enrichment, for the Plaintiffs were not seeking compensation for a benefit received by the Smithsonian.[33] Additionally, as a matter of injury, they have not shown that irreparable harm would occur in transferring the objects to Nigeria.[34] The Plaintiffs then sought a permanent inj [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
” “[T]here is no reason whatsoever to treat exemptions from such Peter-to-Paul mandates as uniquely disfavored under RFRA. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 6:38 am
., concur.Attorneys — Misconduct — Permanent disbarment — Failure tocooperate with disciplinary investigation — Motion for default forfailure to answer — Neglecting an entrusted legal matter —Intentionally failing to carry out contract of employment —Engaging in conduct prejudicial to administration of justice —Handling a legal matter without adequate preparation —Conduct that prejudices or damages a client — Failure… [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:01 am
As for Sarah Palin, the vilification was not a matter of her alleged ordinariness but a matter of her stupidity. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm
The court may further decide the matter upon pleadings, papers and admissions to the extent that no triable issues of facts are raised. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:10 pm
Stamer often has worked, extensively on these and other workforce and performance related matters. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:22 am
The Shotgun Buy-Sell Provision, Deadlock, and Trigger Pull Peter Mahler previously covered here the New York theatre of litigation concerning the Pennsylvania-based cosmetic manufacturer, Process Technologies and Packaging, LLC, a Delaware LLC (“PTP”). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Study suggests ‘not much (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) Green sunset? [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
Finally, Match Group v Muzmatch confirmed that sharing a draft judgment internally for the purpose of identifying any technical and design implications that might be relevant to the parties in preparing submissions on the judgment, agreeing orders on consequential matters and preparing for publication of the judgment is permitted. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
What really matters is the merits of the suit. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Vidal-Hall held that damages for distress were available pursuant to Article 23 DPD and section 13 of the 1998 Act, and such damages are now unexceptional as a matter of UK law. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:10 pm
As written by Peter Lattman at the Wall Street Journal Online Law Blog:"To the disappointment of those who wanted to see a grand debate over the constitutionality of large punitive damage awards, the Court seemed to focus more on the second question presented in the case: Whether due process permits a jury to punish a defendant for the effects of its conduct on people not parties to the lawsuit. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
CONNELL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter W. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:16 pm
As a statistical matter, it is irrelevant to the point Sacks is trying to convey. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 6:51 am
These three words matter,’ Driscoll said. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Peter Corrigan denied the County’s motion, finding the false light claim was not time-barred nor covered by immunity. [read post]
