Search for: "APPLICATION OF GRAHAM" Results 461 - 480 of 1,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Only if that burden is met, does the burden of coming forward with evidence or argument shift to the applicant. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 Accordingly, the Appellate Division ruled that as McLaughlin failed to establish that an exception to the exhaustion doctrine was applicable, Supreme Court should have denied her petition and dismissed the proceeding on the merits.Additionally, in Cox v Subway Surface Supervisors Association, et al., 69 AD3d 438, the Appellate Division, addressing a union’s duty of fair representation, said:1. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
., decided 8/5/2008)Because vicarious liability of vehicle lessors continues to impact liability coverages available to respond to third-party injuries and damages, cases involving the "Graves Amendment" (see, Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:03 am
Grahamalyze your application - In KSR, the Supreme Court ruled that the factors outlined in Graham v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The former News of the World News Editor Greg Miskiw has been speaking to Graham Johnson. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:55 pm by Dennis Crouch
  In Graham though, the Supreme Court indicated that, with minor exceptions, the 1952 Act maintained all the old precedent. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 8:05 am by William H. Holmes
The webinar will discuss the innovative and commercial programs, FIPP, the evolving rules for the program, the application process and the type of projects the program was developed to support. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:16 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kear, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2663 (04 November 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2609 (03 November 2011) Attorney General’s Reference Nos 61, 62 AND 63 of 2011 [2011] EWCA Crim 2619 (27 October 2011) Abdzahra, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2664 (04 November 2011) Bashir, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2763 (03 November 2011) Ciccarelli, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2665 (03 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ablyazov v JSC BTA Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 1386 (28… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:10 am by Blog Editorial
In respect of the slots for the Appellant and the Applicants where several counsel are listed to make submissions, the press office have indicated that they hope to be able to offer more precise guidance on the relevant days of the hearing as to how counsel intend to apportion those slots. [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:15 am
That is not to say, however, that an applicant would never be entitled to a patent in a situation as here. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 5:48 am
Today is the 131st anniversary of Alexander Graham Bell's historic first telephone call to his assistant, Thomas A. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:43 am
" In doing so the Court fails to give any meaningful weight to the two pertinent precedents subsequent to Penry -- Graham and Johnson -- even though those cases adopted a more limited view of Penry I than the Court embraces today. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
The fund...GRAHAM: Did you ever sign a memorandum saying that? [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:24 am
" Further concerns were expressed when Mr Salmond agreed with SNP backbencher Christine Grahame that it would be better if Megrahi's appeal continued. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:47 am by Randall Hodgkinson
The COA made a point of noting that the state conceded the application of Graham and Cribbs in the case:Significantly, the State readily agrees with Vontress' claim that the trial court clearly erred in providing PIK Crim. 3d 56.05-A instead of PIK Crim. 3d 56.05-B. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  All the articles were eventually cited in US patent applications. [read post]