Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am
” Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that “the decision was on balance a victory for environmental groups, as it allowed at least some lawsuits over groundwater discharges. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
” At the Institute for Justice’s CJE Bulletin, Adam Shelton echoes Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent in Thryv v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” In The New York Times’ The Daily podcast, Adam Liptak notes that “[t]his week, the Supreme Court began rolling out a series of major rulings on the jury system, immigration, abortion rights and presidential power; he explore[s] the importance of these decisions during the pandemic. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:40 pm
Question is: Can they persuade a New York court that these circumstances are so unique that the recognition of the defense will not destroy the market? [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:44 am
Briefly: For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “the court led by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Brandes, titled" Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta, appears in the March 2020 issue of the New York State Bar Journal, Vol.92, No. 2 at page 36. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
New York: North Point Press, 2014.Fiordalis, David V., ed. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that in a letter filed with the court on Friday, attorneys for a group of DACA recipients told the court that there are “about 27,000 young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers who work in health care, many of them on the front lines in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Vance concerns whether a New York grand jury can issue a subpoena to Mazars USA (Trump’s accounting firm) that would require Mazars to turn over Trump’s financial records as part of an investigation into possible violations of New York criminal law by several organizations and individuals. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am
” According to Adam Liptak for The New York Times, “[t]here appears to be no reason aside from longstanding custom that the court could not decide all of the remaining cases without oral arguments, relying only on written submissions. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York compel DHS to respond to those requests. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he case, involving a teenager who killed his grandfather, is the latest in a series of cases on the constitutionality of harsh punishments for youths who commit crimes before they turn 18. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm
Booth.In the New York Times: Jane Manners and Lev Menand (both fellows at Columbia Law School) draw on history to discuss whether the Supreme Court will protect agencies from Trump’s reach. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[h]owever the court rules, other abortion cases are likely to follow. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:52 pm
“Justices Give Few Hints on How They Will Rule on Louisiana Abortion Law; The Supreme Court is considering whether Louisiana can require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals, in a case likely to yield an unusually telling decision”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Mary Ziegler writes that “[a]nti-abortion activists … [have] once again asked the Supreme Court to decide that abortion hurts women,” “believe[ing] that arguing harm to women — not fetal rights — is the key to convincing both the court and the nation to let go of Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:01 am
The Supreme Court decision Scott v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:54 pm
“Supreme Court Divided on Trump’s Power to Fire Head of Consumer Bureau; The justices seemed split along familiar lines in a case challenging the independence of the director of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
