Search for: "Ely v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 1,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
The patent therefore stated that inhibition of PD-1 or PD-L1 was effective in treating cancer.Claim breadth As well as deciding there was a clear and unambiguous disclosure, Birss J considered priority from the point of view of plausibility and claim breadth. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:41 am
Oct. 19, 2015) (15 plaintiffs from 11 states); DeCrane v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Subsequently, in Centre Ice Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
Most notably, it invalidated the exclusion of women from the Virginia Military Institute in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with non-Indiana co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly Export S.A. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:36 pm
  The court began its analysis of this issue by noting that[r]elying on U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]