Search for: "Frye v. Frye"
Results 461 - 480
of 637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
² Strickland v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 4:43 am
” (83 NY2d 417, 422 [1994] [citing to Frye v US, 293 F 1013 [App DC 1923]). [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:48 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Frye’s defense attorney and to allow Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:38 am
Frye, 294 Kan. 364, 277 P.3d 1091 (Kansas Supreme Court 2012). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:45 am
California still follows that oldie but not-so-goodie, Frye v . [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
Frye. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 10:18 am
Additional Resources: Nease v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:49 am
Before evidence of a new or novel scientific technique, procedure, or device can be admitted in evidence in California courts, the proffering party must meet the requirements of a three-pronged Kelly rule, formerly known as the “Kelly/Frye” rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm
Frye, defense counsel failed to communicate an offer which, if accepted, would have reduced the exposure for a driving offense; in Laffler v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
With that symbolic opener out of the way, the Court on Tuesday reversed its new surrogate Ninth, the Sixth Circuit in Burt v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:32 am
Frye . [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Frye and State Farm, Dauphin, 2008 CV 17687 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
However, admissibility of scientific evidence is generally governed by FRE 702, along with precedent in Frye v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
See Donaldson v. [read post]
