Search for: "Hatch v Hatch"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 8:17 am
Bargaining failure results from three asymmetries: asymmetric stakes (most important factor in patents: pharma and generics—pure bargaining failure; not much failure to bargain, because notice is super clear and early bargaining is easy—under Hatch-Waxman); asymmetric information (law & econ people think this is where most of the action is in terms of causes of litigation: asymmetric knowledge of info relevant to validity, value, design-around cost); asymmetric… [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
Put Clarke v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 16: Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-OR), left, and Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT), right, speak during the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Congress and U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
In Richmond County Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:50 pm
article=1479&context=btljFurthermore, some people considered inter partes re-examination to be quite effective:Seehttp://sunsteinlaw.com/inter-partes-reexamination-digs-a-patent-graveyard/**Whether challenging pharma patents through non-Hatch-Waxman procedures evadesthe "balance" negotiated at the time of Hatch-Waxman can be contemplated. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
See Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:33 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 2:29 am
This weblog has hosted a series of posts on the subject of litigating patents under the experimental, not quite hatched but nearly-there Unified Patent Court (UPC) system that has been created for the new Europe, with its fascinating new collection of Rules [now that everyone has got used to the 17th draft of the Rules of Procedure, an 18th Draft has been more or less agreed and its adoption has been predicted for this coming December: see PatLit post here]. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:34 am
., et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:27 am
,Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:27 am
Woolen Mill v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:06 pm
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:48 pm
Wills v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
Amgen v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:17 pm
For example, the famous US Supreme Court case of FTC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Windsor and Hollingsworth v. [read post]