Search for: "In Re Conduct of Smith" Results 461 - 480 of 2,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
Justice Elena Kagan briefly raised questions about the clarity of this interpretation, but Roberts applied something like res judicata to historical interpretation: “The dissent, for its part, largely reprises points that the Court has already considered and rejected,” such as “downplay[ing] the decision of 1789. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:11 pm by Cross & Smith
The post How Experts Are Used to Strengthen an Accident Claim appeared first on Cross and Smith. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
  The judgment in the case of Smith v Jones [2020] NSWDC 262 was given on 28 May 2020. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Lustgarten did not actually state that the defendant had ‘falsified’ a medical record or use the terms ‘liar’ or ‘lying’ to describe the other physician or his conduct. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  This requirement was aimed at chilling the efforts of itinerant, out-of-state screening physicians, whose conduct came under scrutiny in In re Silica.[11] Daubert, Its Progeny, and Amended Rule of Evidence 702 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert was not only a watershed in the analysis of expert evidence generally but also reflected specific concerns about expert testimony in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Asks Court Not to ‘Short Circuit’ His Review of Flynn Case New York Times – Charlie Savage | Published: 6/1/2020 The Justice Department’s conduct in abruptly deciding to end the case against President Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn was so unusual it raised a “plausible question” about the legitimacy of the move, a lawyer for the trial judge overseeing that case told a federal appeals court. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:23 pm
” [asked bar owner Kevin] Smith “We’re not here to live in fear. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
In fact, the most plausible reading of the "free exercise" enactments (if their affirmative provisions are read broadly, as the dissent's view requires) is a virtual restatement of Smith: Religious exercise shall be permitted so long as it does not violate general laws governing conduct. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Election Watchdog, Dormant for Months, Can Finally Move into Action New York Times – Rebecca Ruiz | Published: 5/19/2020 The Senate confirmation of James Trainor to the FEC means the agency now will have a quorum to hold meetings and conduct official business. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
Amid the absence of a near-identical court precedent, we’re supposed to believe that the officers in question could not have been aware that their conduct was constitutionally dubious. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith, 2020 ONSC 2782 (CanLII) [19] In my view, the simplest answer to this issue is, “It’s 2020”. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
My review is not meant to be exhaustive, but merely illustrative of the kinds of expectations courts have about how participants will conduct themselves. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am by Russell Knight
… The change in circumstances must, however, be fortuitous in nature and not the result of deliberate action or conduct of the party seeking the reduction. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:24 pm by Gabriel Chin
The panel ordered re-argument in which the amici would have 20 minutes, and Sineneng-Smith only 10. [read post]