Search for: "In Re Means"
Results 461 - 480
of 101,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2007, 4:20 am
Just a quick note.My posting may be a bit sporadic this week -- we're (finally) having the hardwood floors refinished here at the PunditMom household.Due to a lack of full bathroom in the basement, that we means we all have to vacate for a few days -- can't walk on the new stain for a day or two, you know! [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:49 pm
I mean, there’s this assumption that when you’re laid off YOU did something wrong. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm
Finally, our home region has commenced the post-Covid re-opening process. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm
“After a five-year fight, we’re pleased to see the USDA stepping up to stop the cheaters picking the pockets of America’s farmers and ranchers. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
This does not mean that my dignity is my property. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 3:10 am
The back story is so goofy as to be the stuff of legend, but that doesn’t mean things can’t get worse. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm
Korten’s become the predominant social meaning of “corporate governance. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
“We hold that such re-registration is not a ‘registration’ within the meaning of § 1125(d)(1). [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 9:33 am
Obama orders her to kiss him: "You're gonna kiss me. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am
" ]See prior IPBiz post IN RE ROBERT SKVORECZ: confusion over comprising? [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:36 am
The firm is re-announcing the recall of these dangerous products because only two percent of the 98,000 consumers who purchased these units have received a free repair, which means that consumers and their property remain at serious risk. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
It's Queer Theory and I don't mean homosexual. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 9:07 am
But as you’re reading about the “game-changing Wal-Mart decision” just remember that the game it’s changing is probably not the one you’re playing. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
But when we do this, we’re making a categorical error. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
You're not going to win that one. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:11 am
In re Aqua (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
"); see also In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1470 (Fed. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Officer Polanco says if they are just goals, why are officers who fail to make them, re-assigned to different shifts or relocated far from home. [read post]
20 May 2020, 7:08 am
For those members of the United States Senate that are intent on fashioning some degree of immunity for businesses that are re-opening, a bill that includes direction or incentives to insurers to provide coverage – which may be at odds with what the insurers bargained for in particular polices — may ultimately be a means that is at least somewhat less fraught with legislative peril. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:18 am
At this point, almost all midterm election results are in (Florida, we’re looking at you…). [read post]
