Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel" Results 461 - 480 of 893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 3:49 am by David DePaolo
Both made assumptions about the scope and extent of their bargains based on what they knew at the time.What they knew at the time was broken bones, amputations, death and dismemberment.Neither could forecast, nor had any appreciation for, industrial disease, asbestosis, cumulative trauma, psychiatric injury, opioids, or co-morbidity.Guidelines, bill review, utilization schedules, medical networks, and other "tools" were not contemplated either.Back then, professional… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Harrah’s Operating Co., in which an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a grooming code that required female bartenders to wear teased hair, a full face of makeup, and painted fingernails, while requiring of male bartenders only that they have short hair and be clean. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:53 pm
  The LMMA (§40:1299.47(B)(1)(a)(I)) outright forbids suing health care providers before a malpractice claim is evaluated by a medical review panel. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
*Voluntarily withdrawn from the market on Feb. 28, 2005; US FDA March 2006 Advisory Panel recommended for re-approval. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 10:58 am
The FDA has scheduled a public advisory meeting of its Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel for September that will include experts, physicians and patient and industry advocates to review the data and hear public comments from women. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Because home pregnancy tests are Class II medical devices, SPD needed 510(k) preclearance for the Weeks Estimator. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:42 am by Schachtman
Science Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry By 1997, Judge Pointer had appointed a panel of neutral expert witnesses, but the process had become mired in procedural diversions. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm by Schachtman
“Earthquake-Induced Data Loss – We’re All Shook Up” (June 26, 2015). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 6:36 am by Jim Sedor
“They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists,” Donald Trump said in his campaign announcement speech. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:20 pm
End-of-life medical care has come under sharp review recently as policymakers grapple with whether health-care professionals should be reimbursed for talking to patients about their treatment options. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 14-181Issue: Whether the Second Circuit – in a two-to-one panel decision that disregarded the considered opinion advanced by the United States as amicus – erred in holding that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts Vermont's health care database law as applied to the third-party administrator for a self-funded ERISA plan. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Gina McAndrew
No, we’re not talking about the skit performed by the McNees Players at our recent Labor and Employment Seminar. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:36 pm
There is no justification for conflicts of interest in any business, but they’re particularly dangerous in medicine, where people’s lives are at stake. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am by John Ehrett
University of Texas at Austin 14-981Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit’s re-endorsement of the University of Texas at Austin’s use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions decisions can be sustained under this Court’s decisions interpreting the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, including Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]