Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 461 - 480
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:25 am
Lemley, Did eBay Irreparably Injury Trademark Law? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Lemley, Stanford Law School; Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org; John Mayer, Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction; Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media; Stuart Sierra, Columbia Law School; Erika V. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Lemley, Stanford Law School; Carl Malamud, Public.Resource.Org; John Mayer, Center for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction; Tim O’Reilly, O’Reilly Media; Stuart Sierra, Columbia Law School; Erika V. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm
See Lemley, Terms of Use, 91 Minn. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
Guest speakers include, Judge O'Malley, Mark Lemley, David Kappos, and a number of other influential individuals in the IP field. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:42 am
Whether to bring inequitable conduct into the case: risk v. reward. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
OSU v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:33 am
In a case I worked on, XALATAN v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
This is a mess of CLS Bank v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
" In the same footnote, Nokia explains that one can deduce from the findings of fact and conclusions of law in FTC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Accordingly, Solum and Chiang challenge the effectiveness of the solutions proposed by previous studies, which focused upon the tools to be used for interpretation (which suggested looking to unbiased third-party sources such as dictionaries and encyclopaedias, to the patentee’s own usage in the patent specification, or to expert testimony), and reject the idea that claim text be innately defective (see Burk and Lemley here). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
The study uses data provided by Lex Machina (which also provided data for a US Government Accountability Office study on the same issue - a comment based on the GAO's data can be found here), a company which specialises in collecting and analysing IP litigation data (founded by Professor Mark Lemley at Stanford University). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:20 pm
Millar v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
The only legal support for its claim comes from a law review article — co-written by Mark Lemley, one of the attorneys for Puerto 80. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
