Search for: "MATTER OF F B"
Results 461 - 480
of 9,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 10:00 am
Grade: B 8.) [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
(…) The USPTO relies on an 1888 Supreme Court case to argue that, as a matter of law, adding .com to a generic SLD like booking can never be nongeneric. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm
Treasury Regulation Section 1.83-3(f) specifies that property is transferred in connection with the performance of services if it is transferred to an employee or independent contractor (or beneficiary thereof) in recognition of the performance of services, or refraining from performance of services. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
Accordingly, the District Court remanded the case to the Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:58 am
Intentionally concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstance; b. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
§ 2(b)(2)(D), the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:00 am
” While the specific requirements of C.R.C.P. 16(b)(3) are less detailed than F.R.C.P. 26(f), it is a best practice to follow the federal guidelines in state court conferences. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:06 am
The publication is on a matter of public interest and: B. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
See Saada, 930 F.3d at 541–42. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 1:29 pm
See Saada, 930 F.3d at 541–42. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
EEOC must then make a “good faith effort” to conciliate the matter. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm
In a recent opinion by the US District Court on July 30, 2009 in the matter of Alberto Paz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:34 pm
Rule 32(i)(3)(B) requires that the sentencing court shall, for “any disputed portion of the pre-sentence report or other controverted matter,” rule on the question or determine that a ruling is unnecessary, a rule that requires “strict compliance” (Fernandez-Angulo, 897 F.3d at 1516; accord Houston, 217 F.3d at 1208). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Upon denying the respondents' pre-answer motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court should have permitted the respondents to answer the petition (seeCPLR 7804[f]; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Upon denying the respondents' pre-answer motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court should have permitted the respondents to answer the petition (seeCPLR 7804[f]; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Dain Rauscher, Inc., 254 F.3d 852, 855-56 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
The TJCA also prohibits recharacterizing amounts rolled over to a Roth IRA from other retirement plans, such as Code Sec. 401(k) or Code Sec. 403(b) plans. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
§ 905(b). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:56 am
Note, you should not solicit the help of the Taxpayer Advocate until you have tried to resolve the matter at the level at which it was created. [read post]
