Search for: "MATTER OF N C F" Results 461 - 480 of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 3:14 am by Sean Wajert
Tobacco Co., 84 F.3d 734, 745 n. 21 (5th Cir. 1996). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 505 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
(c) Validity and infringement of Apple's utility patents Samsung's claims contesting the jury's findings were rejected. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
The impact on patentability of an award was negated:Thus, the 1999 award lacks the required nexus with the scope of the claims.Also, obvious matter infects non-obvious matter:We further note that our conclusion as to the nexus between this award and the claims is consistent with the long-established rule that "[c]laims which are broad enough to read on obvious subject matter are unpatentable even though they also read on nonobvious subject matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, the Commissioner determined that the protections of 8 NYCRR 30-1.9(c) did not apply to Cronk because, "[f]rom the inception of her employment[,] . . . petitioner never devoted a substantial portion of her time within the English 7-12 tenure area. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
(downloads as a pdf) For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
& C.4th 25, 27 (Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
& C.4th 25, 27 (Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
& C.4th 25, 27 (Pa. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am by Alex Phipps
The Court explained that “[i]f the statutory castle doctrine applies, it disclaims the elements of lying in wait and displaces that offense. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:42 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Second, the appellate court pointed out that when it remanded this matter in Swain I, it had already concluded that the transcript alone provided an insufficient basis to resolve the conflicts in the evidence, and those disputes remained unresolved by the new order. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
National Real Estate Ass’n, Inc. to support their argument that complete diversity did not exist. 894 F.2d 937 (7th Cir. 1990). [read post]