Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES" Results 461 - 480 of 3,691
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
But as noted by Justice Guzman in her concurring opinion, the broader holding is also applicable to residential tenants. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
In retaliation, Gardner, who represents the first state that legalized recreational marijuana, held up Trump Administration nominees for Justice Department posts in order to pressure Sessions into reversing his decision. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 7:00 am by Jonathan Shaub
The Obama administration, for example, repeatedly objected to House committees’ attempt to depose officials without agency counsel present, and issued an opinion shortly before President Trump took office that noted the “constitutional concerns that may be raised by the Committees’ prohibition on attendance by counsel representing the agency. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Ruggerio, decided Oct. 16 by the Vermont Supreme Court (in an opinion written by Justice Carroll), offers an interesting illustration. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Ruggerio, decided Oct. 16 by the Vermont Supreme Court (in an opinion written by Justice Carroll), offers an interesting illustration. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:18 pm by Judicial Watch Blog
House before serving time for racketeering, bribery, obstruction of justice and tax evasion. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:21 am by Russ Bensing
Six of the justices who decided Ferguson are still on the court:  O’Connor wrote the majority opinion, joined by Cupp and O’Donnell, while Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger dissented. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 4:55 am
"On Tuesday the House of Representatives passed HR 1, a bill implementing recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 6:00 pm
The justices' vote represents a major milestone in the long-running debate over unpublished opinions, the sometimes-cursory dispositions that resolve upward of 80 percent of cases in federal appeals courts. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
It may have been the correct decision but Mr Justice Arnold does not explain why Swiss style claims are directed to an actual manufacture of a product, rather than representing a legal fiction. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although the court did not conclusively decide the validity of Proposition 49, Justice Goodwin Liu wrote an opinion explaining why he believed there was a high likelihood that, after full briefing, he would find the measure to be improper. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
House of Representatives – an issue outside the constitutional issues at stake. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 10:27 am by Michael Rushford
  Ironically, Hillary Clinton had it right when she called her husband's affair with a White House intern a "lapse," notwithstanding that it represented an abuse of workplace hierarchies. [read post]
Wade and join an opinion resembling Justice Alito’s draft in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am by Xi Lucy Shi
” Clement argued that in the court’s fist opinion, it referred to the House of Delegates as “the State,” and “the House of Delegates were representing the State with the acquiescence of the State attorney general. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:19 am by Mark Graber
 Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
” What can the House of Representatives do in response to protect its own constitutional equities? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
The order, representing all of the justices save Clarence Thomas, reads: Because the Court of Appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former President necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision. [read post]