Search for: "SILVER v. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 1,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 12:18 am
The judge followed the judgment in the case of Silver Fir [1980] 1 Lloyd's Rep 371 when making her decision regarding the second issue. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am by PaulKostro
” Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, P.C. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
The decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday in Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement Control District v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
  The sex offender registration law has been litigated before in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:16 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
This may be old news to most of you at this point, but because it bears posting on this blog (and because I was out of town last week), here is the rundown on the Sixth Circuit's FSA decision.In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:51 am by Liisa Speaker
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[FN2] Given the [*3]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]