Search for: "State v. Wright" Results 461 - 480 of 2,084
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 27 June 2019 the Culture Secretary, Jeremy Wright, made a written statement to Parliament having opened an investigation into the Evening Standard and Independent after an investor with “strong links” to the Saudi state bought shares in their parent companies. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am by Christopher Tyner
Late last week the United States Supreme Court decided Flowers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Relevant to this holding was the Court's finding that the prosecutor had a history of racially-discriminatory juror selection practices in this case.The case is Flowers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:05 am by Carrie Thompson
Finally, the court found that the state did not supply adequate reasoning for its striking of one particular prospective black juror, Carolyn Wright. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 7:29 am by Steve Erickson
Today, SCOTUS handed down the decision in Flowers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
This is the first part of today's little trilogy of FRAND-related posts.In early May, the Antitrust Division of the DOJ, under Qualcomm's former outside counsel and now-Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim, filed an amicus brief with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California more than three months after the FTC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:44 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Disparaging defense counsel’s integrity Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Marvin Wright, appellant was convicted of first-degree sexual offense, second-degree sexual offense, and sexual abuse of a minor. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(quoting Wright &Miller § 4423, at 612); see Kroeger v. [read post]