Search for: "United States v. State Engineer" Results 461 - 480 of 3,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
The United States taxes the worldwide income of domestic corporations, but gives them a credit against their domestic taxes for foreign taxes they (or a subsidiary) pay. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:18 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Western District of North Carolina – December 11th, 2015 – This is a negligence and loss of consortium case involving falling ice. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:43 pm
Is a determination by the Corps of Engineers that property contains "waters of the United States" and is therefore subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act a "final agency action" subject to judicial review under the Administrative Procedures Act? [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:28 pm by National Indian Law Library
River Spirit Casino (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, jurisdiction)United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Mother’s purpose in moving to the United States was to accept a job offer to work as a civil engineer at an engineering firm in Arizona. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm
Beginning in 2010, Ford replaced the Navistar diesel engine with a new 6.7 liter diesel V-8 which the company designs itself. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 12:47 am
In 1997, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Metro-North Commuter R.R. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:30 am by David Oscar Markus
Big decision from the 11th Circuit yesterday in the sports agent case -- United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A private experiment is not prior art, when it is not published, nor used, sold or otherwise made known, nor included in a United States patent application.Kimberly–Clark Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]