Search for: "Yorker v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2013, 11:36 am by Schachtman
  A political (or a religious) worldview places core commitments above empirical data, as was so clearly revealed in the case of The Vatican v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am by Conor McEvily
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:21 am by John Pfaff
States are eagerly trying to figure out how to reduce their prison populations. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Shaun Marker
Eagle Star Insurance Company,1 the Court stated: Very few New Yorkers are immune from the purchase of insurance. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jill Lepore's latest New Yorker article may be of interest to readers. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:23 pm by Rick Hills
Justice Milton Tingling of the New York supreme court (that's a trial judge for you non-New Yorkers) struck down Mayor Bloomberg's soda portion cap this afternoon, citing the state non-delegation doctrine and the state's administrative law constraint on arbitrary and capricious rule-making. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
” Briefly: This week’s New Yorker contains an 8,000 word profile of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg by Jeffrey Toobin. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
This blog’s Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:16 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court on December 7 agreed to review the constitutionality of Section 3 in the case of U.S. v. [read post]