Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 4781 - 4800 of 13,720
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 3:01 pm by LindaMBeale
  And  no matter how much Rush Limbaugh claims that reducing the corporate tax rate, creating a low tax rate for partnership pass-through income, getting rid of the estate tax and getting rid of the AMT aren't benefits for the rich (because, he says, Trump has insisted that the changes aren't supposed to benefit him), the fact is that they are benefits for the rich and the Trump clan clearly will especially benefit, probably to the tune of hundreds of… [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by John Jascob
The panel, “FCPA Investigations and Enforcement: Developments and Updates,” was part of PLI’s White Collar Crime 2017 program and was moderated by F. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:55 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The court thought it couldn’t figure this out at the motion to dismiss stage, even though the pleading itself apparently distinguished between defendants’ ads and the service defendants sold, so I’d say this could be done on a motion to dismiss.The court also rejected defendants’ copyright preemption argument, because the Seventh Circuit’s holding in Toney indicates that persona (etc.) isn’t copyrightable subject matter because it… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  The Obama DHS also publicly warnedthat “[t]his policy may be modified, superseded, or rescinded at any time without notice. [read post]
  The court emphasized that “[t]he Second Circuit will review this Court’s Rule 23 class certification decision pursuant to Rule 23(f)” but that this review “would not likely encompass the portion of this Court’s decision decertifying the . . . collective action. [read post]
  The court emphasized that “[t]he Second Circuit will review this Court’s Rule 23 class certification decision pursuant to Rule 23(f)” but that this review “would not likely encompass the portion of this Court’s decision decertifying the . . . collective action. [read post]